<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Will Pay You To Use Live Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kbsweb.com/microsoft-will-pay-you-to-use-live-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kbsweb.com/microsoft-will-pay-you-to-use-live-search/</link>
	<description>Techmology Bits</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guy Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.kbsweb.com/microsoft-will-pay-you-to-use-live-search/#comment-1928</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kbsweb.com/?p=297#comment-1928</guid>
		<description>I suspect this move is an act of desperation by Microsoft (see http://www.siliconstrat.com/blog/2008/05/27/microsoft-cashback-search/)  The system is fragile and violates the basic set of needs of users looking for products via search.  Without adding value for users, Microsoft is missing the core of the market.

It is basically a reverse variation of iWon, and we all know what a winner that wasn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect this move is an act of desperation by Microsoft (see <a href="http://www.siliconstrat.com/blog/2008/05/27/microsoft-cashback-search/" rel="nofollow">http://www.siliconstrat.com/blog/2008/05/27/microsoft-cashback-search/</a>)  The system is fragile and violates the basic set of needs of users looking for products via search.  Without adding value for users, Microsoft is missing the core of the market.</p>
<p>It is basically a reverse variation of iWon, and we all know what a winner that wasn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
