<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Browser: Hands-On First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kbsweb.com/google-chrome-browser-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kbsweb.com/google-chrome-browser-first-impressions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:18:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gallatin Guy</title>
		<link>http://blog.kbsweb.com/google-chrome-browser-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-2129</link>
		<dc:creator>Gallatin Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kbsweb.com/?p=326#comment-2129</guid>
		<description>I was so looking forward to chrome. what a let down. lacks some basic features. i did&#039;nt even see a place to add a proxy server. I can understand some bugs, but not 6 DoS vulnerabilties, latest being remote. and a remote stack based over flow. nasty. if this browser would have received the downloads firefox 3 got in its first 24 hours, some kiddie would have had a very large shiney new botnet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was so looking forward to chrome. what a let down. lacks some basic features. i did&#8217;nt even see a place to add a proxy server. I can understand some bugs, but not 6 DoS vulnerabilties, latest being remote. and a remote stack based over flow. nasty. if this browser would have received the downloads firefox 3 got in its first 24 hours, some kiddie would have had a very large shiney new botnet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.kbsweb.com/google-chrome-browser-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-2089</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kbsweb.com/?p=326#comment-2089</guid>
		<description>I remember what it was like to &quot;surf&quot; the internet with a text only browser. I was ticked when Windows 95 restricted the ability of the average shade-tree technologist to monkey with startup files. And I&#039;d sooner use a keystroke combination than touch a mouse. Yes, I still code web pages in Notepad, and no, I don&#039;t care what you think about that.

But I like Chrome. A lot, in fact. I suspect that when the Beta crashes the first time for me I&#039;ll yell, but right now it&#039;s streamlined efficiency has me sold.

I have over 100 &quot;Favorites&quot; stored in IE, but Chrome puts my top dogs RIGHT THERE on the main screen, two clicks from anywhere. It&#039;s a lazy man&#039;s version of your NetVibes! And for some reason, I&#039;m trusting Google to reduce the hassle in ways I never really trusted Microsoft to...

Thanks for the blog, and keep the updates coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember what it was like to &#8220;surf&#8221; the internet with a text only browser. I was ticked when Windows 95 restricted the ability of the average shade-tree technologist to monkey with startup files. And I&#8217;d sooner use a keystroke combination than touch a mouse. Yes, I still code web pages in Notepad, and no, I don&#8217;t care what you think about that.</p>
<p>But I like Chrome. A lot, in fact. I suspect that when the Beta crashes the first time for me I&#8217;ll yell, but right now it&#8217;s streamlined efficiency has me sold.</p>
<p>I have over 100 &#8220;Favorites&#8221; stored in IE, but Chrome puts my top dogs RIGHT THERE on the main screen, two clicks from anywhere. It&#8217;s a lazy man&#8217;s version of your NetVibes! And for some reason, I&#8217;m trusting Google to reduce the hassle in ways I never really trusted Microsoft to&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for the blog, and keep the updates coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingdom media</title>
		<link>http://blog.kbsweb.com/google-chrome-browser-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-2076</link>
		<dc:creator>kingdom media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kbsweb.com/?p=326#comment-2076</guid>
		<description>should be interesting to see if Chrome works more efficiently than FireFox and IE... if it&#039;s faster than Firefox, since isn&#039;t IE, then i&#039;ll use it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>should be interesting to see if Chrome works more efficiently than FireFox and IE&#8230; if it&#8217;s faster than Firefox, since isn&#8217;t IE, then i&#8217;ll use it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://blog.kbsweb.com/google-chrome-browser-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-2074</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kbsweb.com/?p=326#comment-2074</guid>
		<description>&quot;We are so, so happy with Google Chrome,&quot; mumbled Mozilla CEO John Lilly through gritted teeth. &quot;That most of our income is from Google has no bearing on this statement.&quot; - http://notnews.today.com/?p=57</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We are so, so happy with Google Chrome,&#8221; mumbled Mozilla CEO John Lilly through gritted teeth. &#8220;That most of our income is from Google has no bearing on this statement.&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://notnews.today.com/?p=57" rel="nofollow">http://notnews.today.com/?p=57</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.kbsweb.com/google-chrome-browser-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-2073</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kbsweb.com/?p=326#comment-2073</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Interesting.  That would be bad, and I hadn&#039;t thought to test a Flash site until you mentioned it.  

However, I just tried a handful of Flash sites and while they seemed to load slower... they didn&#039;t crash the browser.  

But I&#039;m sure there are a host of bugs to work out... that&#039;s why it&#039;s a beta.  Thanks for letting us know about your experiences.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Interesting.  That would be bad, and I hadn&#8217;t thought to test a Flash site until you mentioned it.  </p>
<p>However, I just tried a handful of Flash sites and while they seemed to load slower&#8230; they didn&#8217;t crash the browser.  </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m sure there are a host of bugs to work out&#8230; that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s a beta.  Thanks for letting us know about your experiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joewxboy</title>
		<link>http://blog.kbsweb.com/google-chrome-browser-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-2072</link>
		<dc:creator>joewxboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kbsweb.com/?p=326#comment-2072</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve gotten Chrome to completely crash just by interacting with Flash:

http://joefilter.blogspot.com/2008/09/google-chrome-crashes-on-flash-based.html

The browser may be buggier and less stable than they were implying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gotten Chrome to completely crash just by interacting with Flash:</p>
<p><a href="http://joefilter.blogspot.com/2008/09/google-chrome-crashes-on-flash-based.html" rel="nofollow">http://joefilter.blogspot.com/2008/09/google-chrome-crashes-on-flash-based.html</a></p>
<p>The browser may be buggier and less stable than they were implying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
