<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Ain&#8217;t Free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kbsweb.com/free-aint-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kbsweb.com/free-aint-free/</link>
	<description>Techmology Bits</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://blog.kbsweb.com/free-aint-free/#comment-1734</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kbsweb.com/free-aint-free/#comment-1734</guid>
		<description>And just whom might this sender be? I think I have a pretty good idea. :) 

I don't have any problems with Spam Assassin, per se. I mean, we  use it to proof outgoing campaigns within our application. However, it's just like anything else, if you don't configure it once you drop it on a machine, you are bound to get undesirable results. 

I do think it's funny that it assigns a small score for being registered with Privacy Post and then a much bigger (additional) score for being listed on open-whois.org for being registered with Privacy Post. That's double dipping for the same *offense*. 

If you're curious, our whois info probably won't be obscured in the near future as we work out some different options for out private label (branded) accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just whom might this sender be? I think I have a pretty good idea. <img src='http://blog.kbsweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any problems with Spam Assassin, per se. I mean, we  use it to proof outgoing campaigns within our application. However, it&#8217;s just like anything else, if you don&#8217;t configure it once you drop it on a machine, you are bound to get undesirable results. </p>
<p>I do think it&#8217;s funny that it assigns a small score for being registered with Privacy Post and then a much bigger (additional) score for being listed on open-whois.org for being registered with Privacy Post. That&#8217;s double dipping for the same *offense*. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re curious, our whois info probably won&#8217;t be obscured in the near future as we work out some different options for out private label (branded) accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.kbsweb.com/free-aint-free/#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kbsweb.com/free-aint-free/#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>Outstanding write up, and an excellent resource where we can point clients that have issues with "free" software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outstanding write up, and an excellent resource where we can point clients that have issues with &#8220;free&#8221; software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
